Once We Geoengineer The Climate, We Can’t Stop Abruptly

geoengeneering 1 27

In the future, should we try to fight climate change by spraying sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere to form a cloud that cools the Earth (a process called geoengineering), ending that plan abruptly could have severe, planet-wide effects on animals and plants, researchers argue in a new paper.

“Imagine large droughts or floods around the world that could be blamed on geoengineering, and demands that it stop. Can we ever risk that?”

“Rapid warming after stopping geoengineering would be a huge threat to the natural environment and biodiversity,” says paper coauthor Alan Robock, a professor in the environmental sciences department at Rutgers University.

“If geoengineering ever stopped abruptly, it would be devastating, so you would have to be sure that it could be stopped gradually, and it is easy to think of scenarios that would prevent that,” Robock says. “Imagine large droughts or floods around the world that could be blamed on geoengineering, and demands that it stop. Can we ever risk that?”

Geoengineering means attempting to control the climate in addition to stopping the burning of fossil fuels, the main cause of global warming, Robock says. While scientists have studied the climate impacts of geoengineering in detail, they know almost nothing about its potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems, the study notes.

The geoengineering idea that’s attracted the most attention is to create a sulfuric acid cloud in the upper atmosphere as large volcanic eruptions do, Robock says. The cloud, formed after airplanes spray sulfur dioxide, would reflect solar radiation and cool the planet. But airplanes would have to continuously fly into the upper atmosphere to maintain the cloud because it would last only about a year if spraying stopped, Robock says. He adds that the airplane spraying technology may be developed within a decade or two.

In their study, the scientists used a global scenario with moderate cooling through geoengineering, and looked at the impacts on land and in the ocean from suddenly stopping it. They assumed that airplanes would spray 5 million tons of sulfur dioxide a year into the upper atmosphere at the Equator from 2020 to 2070. That’s the annual equivalent of about one quarter of the sulfur dioxide ejected during the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, Robock says.

The spraying would lead to an even distribution of sulfuric acid clouds in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. And that would lower the global temperature by about 1 degree Celsius (about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit)—about the level of global warming since the Industrial Revolution began in the mid-1800s. But halting geoengineering would lead to rapid warming—10 times faster than if geoengineering had not been deployed, Robock says.

The scientists then calculated how fast organisms would have to move to remain in the climate—in terms of both temperature and precipitation—that they are accustomed to and could survive in, he says.

“In many cases, you’d have to go one direction to find the same temperature but a different direction to find the same precipitation,” Robock says. “Plants, of course, can’t move reasonably at all. Some animals can move and some can’t.”

He notes that national parks, forests, and wildlife refuges serve as sanctuaries for animals, plants, and other organisms. But if rapid warming forced them to move, and even if they could move fast enough, they may not be able find places with enough food to survive, he says.

One surprising side effect of rapidly starting geoengineering would be an El Niño warming of the sea surface in the tropical Pacific Ocean, which would cause a devastating drought in the Amazon, he says.

“We really need to look in a lot more detail at the impact on specific organisms and how they might adapt if geoengineering stops suddenly,” he says.

The study appears online today in Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Additional coauthors of the paper are from Rutgers University, the University of Maryland, Yale University, and Stony Brook University.

Source: Rutgers University

Related Books

The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World
Author: Oliver Morton
Binding: Paperback
Publisher: Princeton University Press
List Price: $16.95
Offers - Buy New From: $11.89 Used From: $8.49
Buy Now

Geoengineering aka Chemtrails: Investigation Into Humanities 6th Great Extinction Event (B&W)
Author: James W. Lee
Binding: Paperback
Publisher: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
List Price: $18.00
Offers - Buy New From: $17.18 Used From: $16.84
Buy Now

Geoengineering Earth's Climate: Resetting the Thermostat
Author: Jennifer Swanson
Binding: Library Binding
Publisher: Twenty-First Century Books
List Price: $35.99
Offers - Buy New From: $18.32 Used From: $1.78
Buy Now

enarfrhiitptrues

SOLUTIONS

Passive housing cuts costs – and global warming
by Alex Kirby
Buildings which heat and cool themselves – passive housing – save householders money and cut greenhouse gas emissions.
Solar lamps light up more African nights
by Paul Brown
Solar lamps are shining more brightly in Africa, tackling poverty, ill-health and natural hazards, thanks to Chinese…
GMO crops could expect a brighter future
by Paul Brown
Genetically modified (GMO) crops remain controversial, but scientists still have faith that they will help both to…
Planting trees will not slow global warming
by Tim Radford
Nothing, not even the creation of huge plantations of trees to absorb carbon dioxide, is a viable alternative to…
Green energy tips good for business
by Paul Brown
Sharing energy-saving ideas such as using seawater pumps to heat buildings is helping big charities and businesses cut…
Bigger isn't better for energy savings
by Inga Vesper
The desire for more spacious cars and houses is cancelling out energy savings made by environmentally friendly…
Nuclear waste problems start gold rush
by Paul Brown
Staggering sums of money involved in the long-term challenge of solving the world’s nuclear waste problems make it a…

LATEST ARTICLES

How Geo-Engineered Crops May Help And Harm
by Tim Radford,Climate News Network
To cool the world and also boost plant growth, geo-engineered crops might do the trick. But if they work by dimming the…
Scientists Have Known Burning Coal Warms The Climate For A Long Time.
by Joe Romm, Think Progress
On August 14, 1912, a New Zealand newspaper’s “science notes and news” section ran a blurb headlined, “Coal consumption…
The Best Medicine for My Climate Grief
by Peter Kalmus
A climate scientist talks to a psychologist about coping with the crushing stress related to climate change. Here’s…
Climate Models Predict The World Will Be Anomalously Warm Until 2022
by Florian Sévellec
We developed a new prediction system we call PROCAST (PROabilistic foreCAST), and used it to predict the natural…
Holy Dog, It's "Hot As Spain!"
by Robert Jennings, InnerSelf.com
Now it's so hot in Europe that dogs are having to wear shoes. While a nice sunny day may seem like the perfect time for…
Why Forest Carbon Emissions Are Set To Grow
by Tim Radford, Climate News Network
The tropical forests could be at growing risk from climate change. And as they die, rising forest carbon emissions…
Is Climate Change Really To Blame For Slower Atlantic Circulation
by Hannah Hickey
Global warming isn’t the cause of slowdown in a huge circulation pattern in the Atlantic Ocean, which is, in fact, part…
Pantheism And How It Could Offer A New Approach To Preserving The Planet
by Tim Lomas
The scientists responsible for the “doomsday clock” moved it 30 seconds closer to midnight – the symbolic point of…