While their contributions to the climate change movement remain largely unrecognized, people of color are just as concerned—or even more so—as whites, the United States’ majority group, according to new research.
People of color have good reason for their concern. Although racial and ethnic minorities comprise 38% of the US population, studies have found that environmental racism leaves them disproportionately exposed to air and water pollution as well as death from climate-related natural disasters, such as heat waves and hurricanes.
Challenging conventional wisdom
Troy Elias, an assistant professor of advertising who is affiliated with the School of Journalism and Communication’s Media Center for Science and Technology at the University of Oregon, has been working with his colleagues to examine the relationship between life satisfaction and environmental attitudes. Their findings challenge the conventional wisdom that racial and ethnic minorities are less concerned about environmental and sustainability issues than whites.
Elias’ study found evidence that Hispanics, more than blacks and non-Hispanic whites, believe there is more they can do to make a difference when it comes to climate change issues.
“Climate change organizations may be able to make inroads with this group as they continue to become an even greater segment of the American population,” Elias says. “I hope this information will help climate change scientists and journalists better understand the importance of targeting their messages to demographics that are both receptive to them and growing in size.”
According to the Pew Research Center, Hispanics will make up 24% of the nation’s population by 2065, while the percentage of whites will decline to 46%.
“In the United States, Asian Americans are the fastest-growing demographic, followed by Hispanics,” Elias says. “African Americans, while not growing as quickly, exert tremendous influence on American culture. Collectively, Asian Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, and African Americans need to be integrated more extensively into the climate change mitigation movement, given their increasing size, buying power, and political clout.”
Media and climate change attitudes
Climate change affects vulnerable communities worldwide. Elias has also been working with colleagues to find out how “ideological” news consumption—whether it’s liberal-leaning, conservative, or politically neutral—in the United States, Nigeria, Costa Rica, and Brazil affect people’s attitudes toward climate change.
Dani Clarke, a graduate student in the school’s new advertising and brand responsibility master’s program, is helping Elias expand his research internationally.
“I think it is important that advertisers influence positive change, but media as a whole can do that as well,” Clarke says. “The United States is such a big influencer, so looking at how we’re dealing with this, how it affects other places and how they’re dealing with it individually and through the media is really important.”
Climate change hits close to home for Clarke, who is from Florida, and for Elias, who hails from Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean. Both areas are experiencing rising tides, flooding, and increasing susceptibility to extreme hurricanes.
“I grew up around very different attitudes regarding policy and media coverage (of climate change),” Clarke says. “I think a lot of people’s jobs and the economy of those areas intersect with how we handle climate change and the policies that may hurt the industries but will protect the planet.”
The new research appears in the Howard Journal of Communications. Funding for the project on news consumption comes from the Dean’s Fund for Excellence and Innovation and the David and Nancy Petrone Grant for Faculty Excellence at the University of Oregon.
Source: University of Oregon
Related Books
Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future
by Joel Wainwright and Geoff Mann
How climate change will affect our political theory—for better and worse. Despite the science and the summits, leading capitalist states have not achieved anything close to an adequate level of carbon mitigation. There is now simply no way to prevent the planet breaching the threshold of two degrees Celsius set by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. What are the likely political and economic outcomes of this? Where is the overheating world heading? Available On Amazon
Upheaval: Turning Points for Nations in Crisis
by Jared Diamond
Adding a psychological dimension to the in-depth history, geography, biology, and anthropology that mark all of Diamond's books, Upheaval reveals factors influencing how both whole nations and individual people can respond to big challenges. The result is a book epic in scope, but also his most personal book yet. Available On Amazon
Global Commons, Domestic Decisions: The Comparative Politics of Climate Change
by Kathryn Harrison et al
Comparative case studies and analyses of the influence of domestic politics on countries' climate change policies and Kyoto ratification decisions. Climate change represents a “tragedy of the commons” on a global scale, requiring the cooperation of nations that do not necessarily put the Earth's well-being above their own national interests. And yet international efforts to address global warming have met with some success; the Kyoto Protocol, in which industrialized countries committed to reducing their collective emissions, took effect in 2005 (although without the participation of the United States). Available On Amazon
