Energy Development Wins When It's Pitted Against Endangered Species

Energy Development Wins When It's Pitted Against Endangered Species Whooping cranes, a critically endangered species, breed in one location, a wetland in Wood Buffalo National Park. Yet a federal-provincial review panel has approved an oilsands mine that could kill some of the birds. (Shutterstock) Shaun Fluker, University of Calgary

Widespread species decline at the hands of humans is a powerful tale. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, more than 27 per cent of 100,000 assessed species are threatened with extinction. This disappearance is a warning that something is amiss on Earth.

The Anthropocene is the newly recognized geological epoch defined as widespread environmental change or crisis caused by human activity. Some predict history will remember it as the sixth mass extinction event on Earth.

Yet when the choice lies between protecting an endangered species or pursuing economic development, we almost always side with development. Maybe this shouldn’t be a surprise: as a species, we have evolved with a predisposition to favour growth over environmentally rational decisions. The world is literally dying around us as we continue to pursue the myth of endless growth.

Paying no heed

In June 2019, Canada’s federal government approved the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion to carry oil from Alberta to the coast of British Columbia. It did so despite an environmental assessment that found marine vessel traffic associated with the additional pipeline capacity will further dim the already dire prospects for the endangered southern resident killer whales.

This was not much of a surprise, really, since the federal government had already approved the pipeline expansion in November 2016. That approval, however, was quashed by the Federal Court of Appeal in August 2018, in part because the original environmental assessment had failed to consider the pipeline’s adverse impacts to the marine environment.

Energy Development Wins When It's Pitted Against Endangered Species A family of southern resident killer whales swims through the Haro Strait, between Vancouver Island in Canada, and San Juan Island in the United States. (Shutterstock)

At a policy level, Canada marked its commitment to protect species at risk in 1992 when it ratified the UN Convention on Biological Diversity. The federal, provincial and territorial governments agreed to a national approach for the protection of species at risk in 1996.

The strongest legislation to protect species at risk in Canada is generally considered to be the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA). But describing SARA as “strong” is misleading.

Studies show that species are less likely to be listed as threatened or endangered under SARA if they are the target of a commercial harvest. The most obvious example may be the demise of the Atlantic cod, a marine fish once abundant off the coast of Newfoundland. It has still not been listed under SARA despite having lost 99 per cent of its population since the 1960s due to overfishing.

And only rarely does the habitat necessary to the survival or recovery of a species at risk, called critical habitat protection, get legally protected under SARA.

As the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion approval illustrates, SARA is too easily disregarded by federal officials. Arguably SARA has protected only two species from economic development: the small population of greater sage grouse in southeastern Alberta and a population of the western chorus frog in a suburb of Montréal.

Whooping crane woes

Some provinces still have no dedicated legislation for the protection of species at risk. Alberta is one of the laggards. Provincial officials in Alberta routinely approve resource development at the expense of species at risk protection.

Perhaps the most glaring and obvious example is the massive ecological footprint of forestry, drilling sites, seismic lines, oilsands mines and in-situ oil extraction projects in northern Alberta. This has contributed to a sharp decline in woodland caribou populations.

Alberta continues to offer pie-in-the-sky measures to halt this decline. But in 2018, the province suspended efforts to protect caribou habitat, claiming that Albertans needed a caribou protection plan that also protected jobs and the economy. Say what?

Energy Development Wins When It's Pitted Against Endangered Species A recent assessment says 81 per cent of Canada’s woodland caribou herds are in decline, mainly due to altered habitat. (Shutterstock)

On July 25, the Alberta Energy Regulator approved yet another new oilsands mine to be constructed and operated by Teck Resources just 30 kilometres south of Wood Buffalo National Park, despite finding that the mine will have a significant adverse impact on what is left of caribou habitat in this region of Alberta.

The Alberta Energy Regulator also acknowledged that the proposed Teck mine falls under the migratory pathway for the only native population of migratory whooping cranes on Earth (their summer breeding habitat is protected in Wood Buffalo National Park), and that during migration, the cranes could land on the mine’s tailings ponds and come into contact with the toxic soup.

The whooping crane is listed as an endangered species under SARA, and mortality risk during migration is considered to be a primary threat to the overall total population of about 500 birds.

Nonetheless, the Alberta Energy Regulator found that any additional mortality of cranes because of this new mine would not have any adverse impact on the species. It would rely on proposed bird deterrent mechanisms to prevent cranes from landing in the tailings ponds. Yet the effectiveness of all known deterrent mechanisms used by oilsands operators has been questioned and surely any adverse impact on an endangered species should be viewed as significant.

The Teck mine still requires federal approval before it can proceed, so there is perhaps still a distant hope of protecting further destruction of habitat for the threatened caribou and endangered cranes.

Commercial pass

British Columbia is another province without dedicated endangered species protection laws. Enacting new legislation had been a policy priority for the B.C. government until recently, when in response to concerns about the adverse economic impacts of protecting caribou, the premier announced that new legislation was off the drafting table.

The Ontario Endangered Species Act was, at one time, considered to be strong legislation. However, in 2013 the Ontario government enacted regulations under the legislation to exempt certain commercial activities such as forestry, hydro-electric generation, quarrying and wind power generation from rules that protect endangered species.

In April 2019, the Ontario government proposed further amendments to its Endangered Species Act. Environmental advocates say these changes will give industry a free pass to exterminate species at risk in the province.

Economic gain, environmental pain

Meaningful legal protection of species at risk in Canada requires effective legislation implemented by all levels of government, but the provinces are the key. That’s because the overwhelming majority of endangered wildlife in Canada and their habitat are located on lands owned by the provinces.

Habitat loss is the primary cause of species decline and energy development is a significant contributor in this regard. Those with the greatest legal power to protect species at risk (that is, provincial officials) also happen to be those with the most to gain economically from the extraction and development of natural resources.

The result is predictable. Species decline will continue to accelerate in Canada as we push for more energy development and reduce the regulation of resource extraction and economic growth. Legal protection for endangered species in Canada seems to be getting weaker at precisely the moment when it should be getting stronger.

About The Author

Shaun Fluker, Associate Professor of Law, University of Calgary

Related Books

Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future

by Joel Wainwright and Geoff Mann
1786634295How climate change will affect our political theory—for better and worse. Despite the science and the summits, leading capitalist states have not achieved anything close to an adequate level of carbon mitigation. There is now simply no way to prevent the planet breaching the threshold of two degrees Celsius set by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. What are the likely political and economic outcomes of this? Where is the overheating world heading? Available On Amazon

Upheaval: Turning Points for Nations in Crisis

by Jared Diamond
0316409138Adding a psychological dimension to the in-depth history, geography, biology, and anthropology that mark all of Diamond's books, Upheaval reveals factors influencing how both whole nations and individual people can respond to big challenges. The result is a book epic in scope, but also his most personal book yet. Available On Amazon

Global Commons, Domestic Decisions: The Comparative Politics of Climate Change

by Kathryn Harrison et al
0262514311Comparative case studies and analyses of the influence of domestic politics on countries' climate change policies and Kyoto ratification decisions. Climate change represents a “tragedy of the commons” on a global scale, requiring the cooperation of nations that do not necessarily put the Earth's well-being above their own national interests. And yet international efforts to address global warming have met with some success; the Kyoto Protocol, in which industrialized countries committed to reducing their collective emissions, took effect in 2005 (although without the participation of the United States). Available On Amazon

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

enafarzh-CNzh-TWnltlfrdehiiditjakomsfaptruesswsvthtrurvi

POLITICS

Politics tops science under Trump
Politics Tops Science Under Trump
by Kieran Cooke
If you don’t like the news, then suppress it − because politics tops science in the US today, researchers are finding.
People Of Color Don’t Get Credit For Climate Concern
People Of Color Don’t Get Credit For Climate Concern
by U. Oregon
While their contributions to the climate change movement remain largely unrecognized, people of color are just as…
Talk About Loss To Boost Support For Environmental Causes
Talk About Loss To Boost Support For Environmental Causes
by Jim Logan
When it comes to garnering support for environmental causes, talking about the consequences of a loss works better than…
The Warspeak Permeating Everyday Language Puts Us All In The Trenches
The Warspeak Permeating Everyday Language Puts Us All In The Trenches
by Robert Myers
In a manifesto posted online shortly before he went on to massacre 22 people at an El Paso Walmart, Patrick Crusius…
Why Marianne Williamson's Candidacy for President Is Important
Why Marianne Williamson's Candidacy for President Is Important
How do you know something exists if you never hear about it? How do you know about the truth, which is often "the other…
Top Climate Scientist: I Put Myself Through Hell As An IPCC Convening Lead Author, But It Was Worth It
Top Climate Scientist: I Put Myself Through Hell As An IPCC Convening Lead Author, But It Was Worth It
by Pete Smith
In my day job, I am a scientist at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland studying things such as how agriculture…
Not Everyone Cares About Climate Change, But Reproach Won't Change Their Minds
Not Everyone Cares About Climate Change, But Reproach Won't Change Their Minds
by Chloe Lucas, et al
Contrary to opinion polls predicting a groundswell of support for Labor’s relatively progressive agenda on climate and…
Google Searches Reveal Where People Are Most Concerned About Climate Change
Google Searches Reveal Where People Are Most Concerned About Climate Change
by Carla Archibald and Nathalie Butt
What do you do if you have a question? You probably Google it.

LATEST VIDEOS

What Is The Future Of Climate Change?
by Simon Donner
You would think with all the chatter going on about climate that we’d all have a good understanding on the elements of…
Why Marianne Williamson's Candidacy for President Is Important
Why Marianne Williamson's Candidacy for President Is Important
How do you know something exists if you never hear about it? How do you know about the truth, which is often "the other…
Would You Eat Meat Grown From Cells In A Laboratory? Here's How It Works
Would You Eat Meat Grown From Cells In A Laboratory? Here's How It Works
by Leigh Ackland
For many of us, eating a meal containing meat is a normal part of daily life. But if we dig deeper, some sobering…
Climate System “Getting Unhinged” as Massive Heat Wave Causes Record Melting of Greenland Ice Sheet
by Democracy Now!
The massive heat dome that shattered all-time temperature records across much of Europe last week has settled in over…
Why We're Heading For A Climate Catastrophe
by BBC Newsnight
Scientists say the world is completely off track.
A Climate Reckoning In The Heartland
by CBS News
"A historic flood in March 2019 left much of America's heartland under water. Partiularly hard-hit were Midwestern…
What Would Happen If Antarctica Melted?
by Put Put 1
"What Would Happen If Antarctica Melted?
Dr. Peter Wadhams: Arctic Research & the Methane Risk
by UPFSI
Peter Wadhams is back on ScientistsWarning.TV with a comprehensive analysis of the reticent approach that part of the…

LATEST ARTICLES

Pacific Island Nations Will No Longer Stand For Australia's Inaction On Climate Change
Pacific Island Nations Will No Longer Stand For Australia's Inaction On Climate Change
by Michael O'Keefe
The Pacific Islands Forum meeting in Tuvalu this week has ended in open division over climate change.
Ocean Warming Has Fisheries On The Move, Helping Some But Hurting More
Ocean Warming Has Fisheries On The Move, Helping Some But Hurting More
by InnerSelf Staff
Climate change has been steadily warming the ocean, which absorbs most of the heat trapped by greenhouse gases in the…
Politics tops science under Trump
Politics Tops Science Under Trump
by Kieran Cooke
If you don’t like the news, then suppress it − because politics tops science in the US today, researchers are finding.
Fossil Fuel Drilling Could Be Contributing To Climate Change By Heating Earth From Within
Fossil Fuel Drilling Could Be Contributing To Climate Change By Heating Earth From Within
by Rizwan Nawaz and Adel Sharif
Almost all scientists agree that burning fossil fuels is contributing to climate change. But agreement is less clear…
A Virtual Reality Field Trip Through South Florida's Everglades
A Virtual Reality Field Trip Through South Florida's Everglades
by Elizabeth (Liz) Miller
Before cities there were swamps. Wetlands and swamps globally have been sacrificed to pave the way for housing,…
Unique Climate Change Has No Natural Cause
Unique Climate Change Has No Natural Cause
by Tim Radford
The planet is warming faster than ever, worldwide. Scientists know this unique climate change is not caused by nature.…
What Is The Future Of Climate Change?
by Simon Donner
You would think with all the chatter going on about climate that we’d all have a good understanding on the elements of…
People Of Color Don’t Get Credit For Climate Concern
People Of Color Don’t Get Credit For Climate Concern
by U. Oregon
While their contributions to the climate change movement remain largely unrecognized, people of color are just as…