Why Extreme Weather News May Not Change Climate Change Skeptics' Minds

Why Extreme Weather News May Not Change Climate Change Skeptics' Minds How do people respond to media coverage of weather influenced by climate change? AP Photo/Andy Newman

The year 2018 brought particularly devastating natural disasters, including hurricanes, droughts, floods and fires – just the kinds of extreme weather events scientists predict will be exacerbated by climate change.

Amid this destruction, some people see an opportunity to finally quash climate change skepticism. After all, it seems hard to deny the realities of climate change – and object to policies fighting it – while its effects visibly wreck communities, maybe even your own.

News outlets have hesitated to connect natural disasters and climate change, though these connections are increasing, thanks to calls from experts combined with more precise data about the effects of climate change. Media voices like The Guardian advocate for more coverage of the weather events “when people can see and feel climate change.” Harvard’s Nieman Foundation dubbed 2019 “The Year of the Climate Reporter.” Even conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh worried that media predictions about Hurricane Florence were attempts to “heighten belief in climate change.”

But a recent study from Ohio State University communications scholars found that news stories connecting climate change to natural disasters actually backfire among skeptics. As someone who also studies scientific communication, I find these results fascinating. It’s easy to assume that presenting factual information will automatically change people’s minds, but messages can have complex, frustrating persuasive effects.

Why Extreme Weather News May Not Change Climate Change Skeptics' Minds The flooded Platte River in Nebraska is one example of a recent extreme weather event. AP Photo/Nati Harnik

Investigating how skeptics hear the news

Social scientists have an unclear understanding of how climate change news affects public opinion, as not enough research has specifically explored that question. To explore the question, researchers from Ohio State recruited 1,504 volunteers. They divided them into groups who read news stories about natural disasters – fires, hurricanes or blizzards – that either emphasized or omitted the role of climate change.

Cleverly, the researchers recruited participants from geographic areas most likely to experience the disasters they read about; for instance, participants in hurricane-prone areas read the news articles about hurricanes. Further, the researchers ran the study in fall 2017, during hurricane and wildfire season, when these sorts of disasters are presumably top of mind.

After reading, participants answered 11 questions meant to measure their resistance to the article, including “Sometimes I wanted to ‘argue back’ against what I read” and “I found myself looking for flaws in the way information was presented.”

It turned out that climate change skeptics – whether politically conservative or liberal – showed more resistance to the stories that mentioned climate change. Climate change themes also made skeptics more likely to downplay the severity of the disasters. At the same time, the same articles made people who accept climate change perceive the hazards as more severe.

The study findings suggest that reporting the relationship between climate change and hazardous weather may actually increase the skepticism of skeptics, even in the face of blatant contrary evidence. Psychologists call this the boomerang effect, because the message ultimately sends people in the opposite direction.

Who’s hearing the message matters

The boomerang effects seen in this latest study are less surprising than you might think. Researchers have tried a variety of strategies, including emphasizing scientific consensus around climate change and describing the negative health impacts of climate change on people near and far, only to find that skeptics often end up more entrenched after reading attempts to persuade them.

Messages can work when they use place to increase people’s concern and willingness to act on climate change, but individual studies show inconsistent results. One new study gave Bay Area participants maps showing the increased flood risk in their zip code due to projected sea level rise. The maps made no difference in people’s concern about the effects of climate change on future generations, developing countries or the Bay Area. But the maps did make people who accept climate change less concerned that it would personally harm them. These participants may have replaced their abstract, apocalyptic assumptions about climate change threats with the more tangible predictions, causing them to feel less vulnerable.

Another study, also involving Californians, generated slightly more success for place-based climate change news, but only among participants who were already concerned about climate change. Study participants read news articles explaining that climate change would increase droughts either globally or in California. The global message made people more likely to want policy changes, while the local messages made people more likely to say they would change their personal behavior.

Place-based appeals often have some positive effect on people’s willingness to act on climate change and environmental issues.

But most studies about local messaging suggest that you cannot persuade everyone with the same message. A complex relationship of factors – including previous beliefs on climate change, political affiliation, and attachment to place and gender – can all play a role.

And psychologists offer compelling reasons why persuasive attempts sometimes backfire. Messages about the local impact of climate change might actually replace people’s abstract, altruistic values with utilitarian concerns. In the case of skeptics resisting news about climate-driven disasters, the researchers from Ohio State suggest that these people are engaged in motivated reasoning, a cognitive bias where people force new and threatening information to conform to their pre-existing knowledge.

Why Extreme Weather News May Not Change Climate Change Skeptics' Minds More and more info doesn’t necessarily convince. AP Photo/Jay Reeves

More news may not convince

Resistance to news about climate change disasters might be frustrating, but even the media often ignore the role of climate change in disasters, according to an analysis by the nonprofit consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen. They found only 7 percent of American news stories about hurricanes mentioned climate change in 2018. Percentages increase for stories about wildfires (27.8 percent of stories), extreme heat (34 percent of stories) and drought (35 percent of stories). But an overwhelming amount of extreme weather news coverage never mentions climate change.

Some omissions are particularly striking. Liberal research organization Media Matters found only one mention of climate change in 127 broadcast news stories during two weeks of extreme heat in 2018. Only about 4 percent of stories about Hurricane Irma and Harvey mentioned climate change, according to an academic analysis that included The Houston Chronicle and the Tampa Bay Times.

Despite these low numbers, U.S. climate change coverage related to extreme weather and disasters actually rose in 2018, according to the report from Public Citizen. This increase aligns with a trend of news slowly improving its climate reporting. For instance, U.S. print media has dropped some of the skepticism from its climate change reporting, both in terms of outright skepticism of the basic science and a subtler version that involved creating a false balance by including voices which both affirm and deny the reality of climate change.

Even if the media continues to increase and improve its climate change coverage, it might not change skeptics’ minds. Of course, the media has a responsibility to report the news accurately, regardless of how some people process it. But those hoping that climate change news will convert skeptics might end up disappointed.

Given this resistance to news, other approaches, such as avoiding fear-inducing and guilt-based messaging, creating targeted messages about free-market solutions, or deploying a kind of “jiu jitsu” persuasion that aligns with pre-existing attitudes, may prove more effective at influencing skeptics. In the meantime, social scientists will continue to investigate ways to combat the stubborn boomerang effect, even as the consequences of climate change intensify all around us.The Conversation

About The Author

Ryan Weber, Associate Professor of English, University of Alabama in Huntsville

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Related Books

List Price: $12.99
Sale Price: $12.99 $9.53 You save: $3.46


List Price: $25.95
Sale Price: $25.95 $19.46 You save: $6.49


List Price: $6.95
Price: $6.95


English Afrikaans Arabic Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Dutch Filipino French German Hindi Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Malay Persian Portuguese Russian Spanish Swahili Swedish Thai Turkish Urdu Vietnamese

EVIDENCE

Australia’s Epic Story Is A Tale Of Amazing People, Amazing Creatures And Rising Seas
Australia’s Epic Story Is A Tale Of Amazing People, Amazing Creatures And Rising Seas
by Michael Bird, et al
The Australian continent has a remarkable history — a story of isolation, desiccation and resilience on an ark at the…
Did European Colonization Precipitate The Little Ice Age?
Did European Colonization Precipitate The Little Ice Age?
by InnerSelf Staff
Many of us think that rapid environmental change is a quintessentially modern crisis.
Do We Blame Climate Change For Last Summer’s Global Heat Waves
Do We Blame Climate Change For Last Summer’s Global Heat Waves
by Peter Rüegg
The only explanation for why heat waves affected so many areas over several months last summer is climate change,…
Thawing Permafrost Is Triggering Thousands Of Landslides Across The Arctic
Thawing Permafrost Is Triggering Thousands Of Landslides Across The Arctic
by Dave Petley
Early spring temperatures in the town of Deadhorse, on the north coast of Alaska, average -17°C. But with global…
Why Extreme Weather News May Not Change Climate Change Skeptics' Minds
Why Extreme Weather News May Not Change Climate Change Skeptics' Minds
by Ryan Weber
The year 2018 brought particularly devastating natural disasters, including hurricanes, droughts, floods and fires –…
Why the ocean you know and love won’t exist in 50 years
by David Wallace Wells, Big Think
Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them,…
The day the Earth’s climate went berserk
The day the Earth’s climate went berserk
by Kieran Cooke
The day in 1815 when the world’s climate went berserk was only the start of months and years of global climate…
2015-2016 El Niño triggered disease outbreaks across globe
2015-2016 El Niño triggered disease outbreaks across globe
by Samson Reiny, NASA's Earth Science News Team
The 2015-2016 El Niño event brought weather conditions that triggered regional disease outbreaks throughout the world,…

LATEST VIDEOS

Noam Chomsky: The Green New Deal Is Exactly the Right Idea
by Democracy Now!
Supporters of the Green New Deal are launching a nationwide tour Thursday to build support for the congressional…
Sea Creatures Store Carbon In The Ocean – Could Protecting Them Help Slow Climate Change?
Sea Creatures Store Carbon In The Ocean – Could Protecting Them Help Slow Climate Change?
by Heidi Pearson
As the prospect of catastrophic effects from climate change becomes increasingly likely, a search is on for innovative…
Rise of The Methane; Latest Science on Temporal and Spatial Variations
by Paul Beckwith
Since 2007 atmospheric methane concentrations have risen strongly; average rate 7 ppb per year. Methane’s…
A Message from the Future with AOC: New Film Imagines World Transformed by the Green New Deal
by Democracy Now!
As the push for the Green New Deal builds momentum in the United States, The Intercept has released a short illustrated…
How Nepal’s Rivers Give Green Power To Remote Areas
How Nepal’s Rivers Give Green Power To Remote Areas
by Duke University
Researchers are investigating a method of creating power from fast moving streams that many rural areas in Nepal use.
Why the ocean you know and love won’t exist in 50 years
by David Wallace Wells, Big Think
Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them,…
Carbon from soil & trees: curse or cure?—Interview w/Thomas Crowther—Radio Ecoshock 2019-03-06
by Radio Ecoshock
There is far more carbon stored in the soil of planet Earth than in its atmosphere. If soil organisms release that…
Climate Bind: trauma & psychoanalysis—Interview w/Judith Deutsch—Radio Ecoshock 2019-02-27
by Radio Ecoshock
Is climate change getting you down? Does it keep you up at night? Artists and academics are trying to express this new…

LATEST ARTICLES

How Rain On Other Side Of The Planet Foreshadows California Heat
How Rain On Other Side Of The Planet Foreshadows California Heat
by Kat Kerlin
When heavy rain falls over the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia and the eastern Pacific Ocean, it is a good indicator…
Noam Chomsky: The Green New Deal Is Exactly the Right Idea
by Democracy Now!
Supporters of the Green New Deal are launching a nationwide tour Thursday to build support for the congressional…
Australia’s Epic Story Is A Tale Of Amazing People, Amazing Creatures And Rising Seas
Australia’s Epic Story Is A Tale Of Amazing People, Amazing Creatures And Rising Seas
by Michael Bird, et al
The Australian continent has a remarkable history — a story of isolation, desiccation and resilience on an ark at the…
Sea Creatures Store Carbon In The Ocean – Could Protecting Them Help Slow Climate Change?
Sea Creatures Store Carbon In The Ocean – Could Protecting Them Help Slow Climate Change?
by Heidi Pearson
As the prospect of catastrophic effects from climate change becomes increasingly likely, a search is on for innovative…
Why It's So Hard To Detect The Fingerprints Of Global Warming On Monsoon Rains
Why It's So Hard To Detect The Fingerprints Of Global Warming On Monsoon Rains
by Jonathan Eden
The devastating floods in the Indian state of Kerala are a stark reminder of the vulnerability of the world’s most…
Rise of The Methane; Latest Science on Temporal and Spatial Variations
by Paul Beckwith
Since 2007 atmospheric methane concentrations have risen strongly; average rate 7 ppb per year. Methane’s…
Why Climate Protesters Should Be Wary Of 12 Years To Breakdown Rhetoric
Why Climate Protesters Should Be Wary Of 12 Years To Breakdown Rhetoric
by Myles Allen
I was invited to speak to a group of teenagers on climate strike in Oxford recently. Like many scientists, I support…
Change Is Hitting Hard Across New Zealand, Official Report Finds
Climate Change Is Hitting Hard Across New Zealand, Official Report Finds
by Robert McLachlan
The major focus on climate change in Environment Aotearoa 2019, a stocktake on New Zealand’s environment released…